Skip to content
James Chenmitnerd
Menu

Protocol · Fat loss

How I lost the fat without melting muscle.

People keep asking how I lost fat so fast. I wasn’t melting muscle — lean mass held, so almost all of the scale drop was fat. It accelerated once I stopped chasing the wrong “fat-burn zone” chart and ran a simple formula:

Protect muscle (protein + lift) + a sustainable weekly deficit + enough Zone 2 cardio in the Fatmax plateau that I can actually repeat every week.

N=1 Withings proof, April to August 2026: weight 175 to 160 lb, fat 23% to 11.7%, lean mass 77% to 86.7%.
Withings, April → end of August 2026. Same story as Protocol Results. Lean held, so almost all of the scale drop was fat.

Withings, April → end of August 2026. Same story as Protocol Results.

The formula

Three interventions. That is the whole stack.

  1. 01 · Cardio

    Fatmax at 120 bpm

    One number I can lock. Two 40-minute sessions a week as the floor.

  2. 02 · Muscle

    Protein + lift

    Hold lean while I cut. Three strength days. That is why the drop looked fast without costing capacity.

  3. 03 · Food

    A sustainable weekly deficit

    Eat a bit less than I burn. Macros in ratio. Nothing heroic. The week is the unit, not the session.

  1. 01 · Cardio

    Fatmax at 120 bpm.

    What I’m doing

    Aim
    120 bpm — one number, not a range. Easier to lock mid-session than a band I have to babysit.
    Floor
    2× / week × 40 min. That is the minimum I protect. I try to beat it when recovery allows.
    Extras
    A weekend session if there are no family plans. Sometimes after strength if I still have energy.
    How
    Low-impact so I can think. Podcasts every time. Treadmill walk by default, elliptical about 25% of the time, stairmaster sometimes.
    Constraint
    I would rather walk or jog outside, but there are no sidewalks here and it is flat, so BPM will not hold. I am looking at a weighted vest for outdoor Zone 2.

    Why 120. Pick your number.

    Here is the research path that got me to 120 — and a simple table so you can pick yours. Try it 3–4 weeks and tell me how it goes.

    The treadmill still labels a “fat-burn zone” at an easy effort because a bigger share of those calories come from fat. That percentage chart is true, and it is the wrong question. At a stroll you might be mostly fat-fueled and barely working. The honest chart is grams of fat oxidized per minute. That peaks at moderate intensity — Fatmax — around the top of Zone 2.

    Teaching sketch: treadmill fat-burn percentage versus grams of fat oxidized, peaking in Zone 2.
    Teaching sketch, not my N=1. The left chart is what machines love. The right chart is the question I actually care about.

    As effort climbs, carbohydrate takes a larger share of the mix. Zone 2 is the plateau where fat is still the main fuel and total work is high enough that the grams add up — and low enough that I can do it again this week. The lab version of that mix is respiratory exchange ratio: about 0.7 when you are oxidizing fat, about 1.0 when you are on carbohydrate.

    Teaching sketch of fat versus carbohydrate fuel mix across effort, with Zone 2 Fatmax plateau highlighted.
    Teaching sketch. The gold line is fat grams, not the fat percentage. It peaks in the Zone 2 plateau, then falls as carbohydrate takes over.

    In-session fat grams keep rising if you stay on the machine for two hours. Recovery does not. A 150-minute hero session is how you skip Thursday. Forty minutes is the floor I protect: long enough to spend real time at Fatmax, short enough that two sessions a week actually happen.

    Teaching sketch of session length versus repeatable weekly fat-loss benefit, with a 40-minute floor and a 150-minute hero session.
    Teaching sketch. Forty minutes is the floor I protect. A 150-minute hero session is how Thursday disappears.

    Pick your number.

    Estimated max HR = 220 − age. Zone 2 is 60–70% of that. The target I use is 70% — then I lock one number. Mine sits around a 178 max, so 70% is about 125. I aim at 120.

    Table A · by age

    Zone 2 heart-rate targets by age using 220 minus age
    AgeEst. max HRZone 2 (60–70%)Target (70%)
    30190114–133133
    35185111–130130
    40180108–126126
    45175105–123123
    50170102–119119
    5516599–116116
    6016096–112112

    Table B · if you know max HR

    Zone 2 heart-rate targets from a known maximum heart rate
    Max HRZone 2 (60–70%)Target (70%)
    170102–119119
    175105–123123
    ~178 (mine)107–125120
    180108–126126
    185111–130130
    190114–133133

    ~178 max → I aim 120. One number I can see on a watch without doing math mid-stride. It still sits in Zone 2.

    Sources

  2. 02 · Protect muscle

    Protein + lift.

    What I’m doing

    Lift on the Base Protocol schedule — strength about three days a week. Keep protein high enough to hold lean while cutting. The exact grams stay on the protein + food pillar; this page is the reason that pillar exists on a cut.

    Daily burn above intake, without building or protecting muscle, can pull from lean tissue. The goal is not “work harder empty.” It is a deficit with muscle protected. That is why the scale drop looked so fast without melting muscle.

    Concept panel: a deficit alone can spend lean tissue; a deficit with protein and lifting holds muscle.
    Concept, not a lab printout. Daily burn above intake with nothing telling the body to keep muscle is how lean disappears with the fat.

    Sources

    • Strength training

      The signal to keep — and later build — lean mass while you cut.

    • Weight loss

      Scale weight is a mix. Fat and lean do not have to move together.

  3. 03 · Weekly deficit

    Sustainable. Nothing heroic.

    What I’m doing

    Eat a bit less than I burn. Macros in ratio, a small deficit — the same story as the nutrition pillar. Less junk. I do not live at 150-minute sessions to “earn” fat loss.

    Session fat grams are not the scale. The week is. Zone 2 supports the deficit; food is still the main lever. Protect the 40-minute floor so the cardio actually repeats. Do not turn one long session into the whole plan.

    Sources

    • Calorie deficit

      The week is the unit. Session fat grams are not the scale.

    • Food energy

      Energy in versus energy out, without turning it into a religion.

Try your number.

If you want a starting point, take 70% of max HR — from the table, or from a number you actually know — and lock one bpm you can hold. Try it 3–4 weeks. Tell me how it goes. This is not a prescription. It is the formula that moved my N=1.

The rest of the subset, the products, and the six-month charts live on Protocol. The outcome I am holding is Lose fat, on Health goals. Please sign up for the daily newsletter of helpful information and tips at Immortals.

This is personal tracking, not medical advice. I am sharing an N=1 scorecard so the work is visible — not a protocol to copy blindly. Read Bryan’s protocol at the source, and talk to a clinician who knows you.